토토사이트 검증

I Studied People Who Think Leisure Is A Waste Of Time — Here's What I Found 

At the point when I initially took my now-spouse to Turkey, I attempted to set myself up for whatever might turn out badly – postponed flights, language challenges, processing issues. 토토사이트 검증

Yet, I wasn't prepared when, as we strolled into a wonderful sea shore club on the Aegean coast, he protested, "What are we going to do?" 

"What do you mean?" I said. "Rests, partake in the sun and the ocean." 

"Be that as it may, what might be said about what to do – sea shore volleyball, Frisbees, water sports?" 

"There isn't any of that. We're only here to unwind." 

This was the first occasion when I got a feeling of our social contrasts. He's American and I'm Turkish. He expected to "do stuff." I needed to chill. Throughout the long term, he turned out to be better at unwinding – more Turkish, maybe. 

Yet, I began seeing all the ways the basic to "do stuff" continued walking along in the U.S. 

It transformed and moved into succinct expressions like YOLO – "you just live once" – and "rise and crush." I saw it in the manner in which individuals boasted concerning how bustling they were, as though it were a symbol of honor. Furthermore, I saw it in the ascent of "hustle culture," or the aggregate inclination to finish however much in as brief period as could be expected, while continually watching out for the following chance. 

Fundamental every last bit of it is the conviction that resting or unwinding is an exercise in futility. 

I pondered: How may these mentalities impact individuals' prosperity? What's more, are a few societies almost certain than others to advance such convictions? 

Destroying all the good times 

In a progression of new examinations I directed with individual advertising educators Gabbie Tonietto, Rebecca Reczek and Mike Norton, we made a pass at discovering a few replies. 

In one review, 141 college understudies took an interest at our social lab at the Ohio State University. They showed up to finish a progression of reviews wherein we asked them the degree to which they concurred with specific proclamations – "Time spent on relaxation exercises is regularly sat around," "Most recreation exercises are an approach to consume time" – that deliberate whether they supported the possibility that relaxation is inconsequential. 

During these generally dull and dreary examinations, members watched four amusing and famous YouTube recordings that were evaluated engaging by an alternate arrangement of members. Subsequent to observing every one of the four recordings, members showed the amount they appreciated them. 

We viewed that members who accepted relaxation to be inefficient didn't partake in the recordings so much. 

In a subsequent report, we requested that members demonstrate the amount they delighted in taking part in an assortment of relaxed encounters – some dynamic, such as working out, and some detached, such as staring at the TV. Others were social – spending time with companions – or lone, for example, reflecting. 

We tracked down that the people who saw recreation as inefficient would in general get less delight out of the entirety of the various kinds of exercises. Moreover, these individuals were likewise bound to be worried, restless and discouraged. 

A mentality that is hard to shake 

In an alternate report, we needed to see the degree to which this was an exceptionally American marvel. So we selected members from France, the U.S. What's more, India – nations picked for being low, medium and high, individually, on Hofstede's industry-extravagance measurement, which catches the degree to which a given culture is work-arranged and values confidence. 

We requested that they show how much they concurred with the possibility that relaxation is inefficient. Steady with the overarching generalizations, there were far less French members who accepted that relaxation was inefficient contrasted with American and, particularly, Indian ones. 

In any case, French individuals who held a negative perspective on relaxation were as prone to be worried, restless and discouraged as their American and Indian partners. So while Americans and Indians may all the more promptly accept that relaxation is inefficient, the outcomes of holding this conviction are all inclusive. 

The COVID-19 pandemic has pronouncedly affected the way we live, work and mingle. During this period, many individuals have made a stride back and reexamined their needs. 

We contemplated whether individuals' perspectives toward relaxation had moved. Since we had information from both pre-and post-pandemic examinations, we had the option to look at the two. 

Incredibly, we didn't discover any proof of these convictions declining after the pandemic. 

As far as we might be concerned, this uncovered how dug in the conviction that relaxation is inefficient can be. 

Another review insisted it. In this one, members read an article that either examined the viability of espresso creators or depicted recreation in one of three potential ways: inefficient, useless or useful. Members then, at that point played the computer game Tetris for five minutes and disclosed to us how agreeable it was. We tracked down that the individuals who read an article depicting recreation as inefficient and ineffective didn't partake in the game however much the people who read about relaxation being useful or found out with regards to espresso producers. 

In any case, portraying relaxation as useful didn't build delight past its benchmark levels. So apparently outlining relaxation as useful – say, as a decent method to oversee pressure or re-energize your batteries – doesn't expand how much individuals appreciate recreation. 

Not all recreation is equivalent 

In the examinations I portrayed above, we zeroed in only on what clinicians call "terminal relaxation" – recreation that happens only for satisfaction. 

This varies from "instrumental relaxation" – recreation that may fill a bigger need, such as making companions or remaining sound, and thusly feels more useful. 

So we investigated whether the negative perspectives toward recreation would be less unfavorable for instrumental relaxation exercises. 

In 2019, on the Monday after Halloween, we requested that members review what they did and disclose to us the amount they appreciated it. We discovered the conviction that recreation was inefficient was especially impeding for the satisfaction in terminal exercises like going to a party. Then again, it supported the delight in instrumental exercises, for example, taking their children going house to house asking for candy, which could be viewed as a holding experience. 

The uplifting news? Regardless of whether a specific action is terminal or instrumental relaxation is relative and relies upon the individual and the circumstance. For example, individuals might practice for the sake of entertainment (a terminal inspiration) or to get thinner (an instrumental inspiration). The edge can generally be changed.