안전놀이터

Quality Weingarten: When It Comes To Sports Interviews, Don't Be Such A Silly Ask 

In the event that you are an avid supporter, as I am, and furthermore a conscious individual, as at any rate a couple of my perusers are, you know about the incredibly stale nature of sports interviews.안전놀이터

Competitors are compelled to direct them, despite the fact that — in light of the fact that they are competitors and not, say, proficient thinkers or even English majors who graduate and afterward need to take occupations in the enormous machine fix industry — relational abilities are only occasionally their best-sharpened gifts. Likewise, they are frightened by saying The Wrong Thing, since their expressions will in general be enhanced by the games media intensifying machine into explanations of Churchillian gravity. As a reasonable outcome, they generally depend on safe banalities. Somewhat recently alone, competitors were cited in excess of multiple times about how they or their groups need to raise their exhibitions "to another level." Translation: "Win more." 

It's truly not reasonable. It would be like somebody requested, legally, that you, actually, as a trade-off for your decent pay as a realtor, go on public TV once every month and play the Chaconne from Bach's Partita No. 2 in D Minor on a clarinet. Without a doubt, you could bone up on it ahead of time, however it wouldn't be pretty. 

Story proceeds underneath commercial 

Watch a competitor giving a meeting. It is obvious that there isn't anything on the planet they might less want to do, with the conceivable exemption of submitting to the Pear of Anguish, a middle age torment gadget so terrible, regardless of its entertaining name, that I am not allowed to depict it here. You may find it, however I don't suggest it. 

The competitors, at news gatherings, look left and right, and answer monosyllabically, or with an excruciating banality, clearly imploring that the torment will end after the following inquiry, which is unavoidably idiotic. That is the second 50% of the issue. Sportswriters need to continue to ask nitwit inquiries, on the grounds that, truly, all postgame questions boil down to, fundamentally, "Did it feel great to win?" Or, then again, "Were you mooched out to lose?" Or, at times, abnormally, there is this odd design of inquiry that isn't really an inquiry at all and exists just in sports interviews, for example, "Along these lines, Wally seemed as though he had his best stuff working around evening time." (Answer: "Yop.") 

Once in a while, it gets truly horrifying, when the competitor, or the group, has been doing ineffectively. By then, the interviewee looks vulnerable, similar to the pimply, imposing geek in thick glasses compelled to play dodgeball in the school rec center and take it, over and again, in the head. ("How could it feel to lose 15 to 2?" "Awful.") 

Story proceeds underneath commercial 

So here is my proposition. I offer it's anything but a recognition for Naomi Osaka. How about we proceed with the games interviews — the media should be taken care of — however change the inquiries. No idiotic, prosaic inquiries permitted. Offer the competitors a reprieve. Give them something to work with. 

"Along these lines, incredible game around evening time. On the off chance that you were at a local gathering and obstructed the latrine actually seriously, would you tell anybody or simply leave the restroom like nothing had occurred?" 

"Which sports journalist has the most exceedingly awful breath?" 

"Was ist Ihre Lieblingsfarbe?" Ha-ha! That is German, however I'll decipher. What is your #1 shading? 

"You may punch me in the face now."