토토사이트

Quality Weingarten: When It Comes To Sports Interviews, Don't Be Such A Silly Ask 

On the off chance that you are an avid supporter, as I am, and furthermore a conscious person, as at any rate a couple of my perusers are, you know about the incredibly flat nature of sports interviews.토토사이트

Competitors are compelled to lead them, despite the fact that — in light of the fact that they are competitors and not, say, proficient scholars or even English majors who graduate and afterward need to take occupations in the enormous apparatus fix industry — relational abilities are rarely their best-sharpened gifts. Additionally, they are frightened by saying The Wrong Thing, since their expressions will in general be enhanced by the games media intensifying machine into articulations of Churchillian gravity. As a reasonable outcome, they for the most part depend on safe banalities. Somewhat recently alone, competitors were cited in excess of multiple times about how they or their groups need to hoist their exhibitions "to another level." Translation: "Win more." 

It's truly not reasonable. It would be like somebody requested, legally, that you, by and by, as a trade-off for your pleasant pay as a realtor, go on public TV once every month and play the Chaconne from Bach's Partita No. 2 in D Minor on a clarinet. Of course, you could bone up on it ahead of time, yet it wouldn't be pretty. 

Story proceeds beneath promotion 

Watch a competitor giving a meeting. It is evident that there isn't anything on the planet they might less want to do, with the conceivable exemption of submitting to the Pear of Anguish, an archaic torment gadget so horrendous, regardless of its funny name, that I am not allowed to portray it here. You may find it, however I don't suggest it. 

The competitors, at news meetings, look left and right, and answer monosyllabically, or with a difficult banality, clearly imploring that the torment will end after the following inquiry, which is unavoidably inept. That is the second 50% of the issue. Sportswriters need to continue to ask dolt inquiries, in light of the fact that, truly, all postgame questions boil down to, fundamentally, "Did it feel great to win?" Or, on the other hand, "Were you mooched out to lose?" Or, at times, peculiarly, there is this bizarre design of inquiry that isn't really an inquiry at all and exists just in sports interviews, for example, "Along these lines, Wally seemed as though he had his best stuff working around evening time." (Answer: "Yop.") 

Once in a while, it gets truly horrendous, when the competitor, or the group, has been doing inadequately. By then, the interviewee looks unprotected, similar to the pimply, imposing geek in thick glasses compelled to play dodgeball in the school rec center and take it, over and again, in the head. ("How could it feel to lose 15 to 2?" "Awful.") 

Story proceeds beneath ad 

So here is my proposition. I offer it's anything but an accolade for Naomi Osaka. How about we proceed with the games interviews — the media should be taken care of — however change the inquiries. No moronic, dull inquiries permitted. Offer the competitors a reprieve. Give them something to work with. 

"In this way, extraordinary game around evening time. On the off chance that you were at a local gathering and obstructed the latrine actually gravely, would you tell anybody or simply leave the washroom like nothing had occurred?" 

"Which sports journalist has the most exceedingly terrible breath?" 

"Was ist Ihre Lieblingsfarbe?" Ha-ha! That is German, yet I'll interpret. What is your number one tone? 

"You may punch me in the face now."