사설토토

Venus Can Do Whatever She Wants
What is Venus' Secret? 사설토토

That the more established Williams has no "can-do attitude"?
All of you know "indomitable attitude." You all know "succeed no matter what."

In male-ruled games, succeed no matter what is our "mom's milk." So unexpected. Venus doesn't live by our statement of faith. Does that make her an underachiever, somebody you wouldn't need your youngster to imitate?

Or then again does it improve her, more experienced, more human, more profound than we right? Does it make her our Amazon Mother, showing us a higher plane, a more extensive skyline, a better approach to contend?

Is that Venus' Secret?

We hear, respect, even interest maxims about "winning" from all our competitor advocate constantly. A grand slam record "amounts to nothing," says Barry Bonds, on the grounds that the main thing that is important to him (he says) is winning a World Series. He says this is on the grounds that he trusts it, somewhat, however for the most part since that is the way he's been prepared; he surely understands what we need to hear to comfort ourselves and acclaim him. That is what we will acknowledge from our competitors. Why? Since, we say, it's "unselfish." Emmitt Smith "couldn't care less" about breaking the NFL hurrying record on the grounds that the "main thing that matters is another Super Bowl ring, since four of them beats three." Michael Jordan pledged never to lose at anything to anyone, will not address you assuming you beat him ... Endlessly ...

Then, at that point, we have Venus, representation of still water running profound.

So what's more significant, winning a third, fifth, seventh U.S. Open, after you've won two, one after the other, in blowaway design? Or then again is it assisting a more youthful, more weak sister, one you with feeling answerable for, accomplish her own title potential, and have a decent outlook on herself? A hero who'd prefer her kin have a decent outlook on herself than win increasingly an and another title?

Foolishness, we say. Bullcrap. Frail. Delicate. Every one of the popular expressions.

Men, ladies, methinks we doth fight excessively.

Venus is unpretentious in her ministrations. Serena takes note. Yet, isn't that right?

Would we be able to get where Venus is taking us? I contemplated this recently, when Chris McKendry's meeting with Serena ran on ESPN. Serena uncovered she guilefully enrolled in a competition when they were kids, got the whole way to the finals, where Venus beat her, 2 and 2. She said it with renunciation. Then, at that point, she lit up, having recalled that once Venus gave her a gold prize for winning ahead of all comers, let Serena know that she, Venus, enjoyed the silver second-place prize Serena had won better, so perhaps they could switch. Assuming this occurs in a film, we'd generally get cloudy and appreciate Venus and get it. Furthermore obviously the less intelligent however more euphoric and unconstrained more youthful sister Serena took the gold prize and was happy to get it. Venus was happy, as well. Happy to see her cheerful.

That is the sort of familial love we celebrate when we go out to see the films or read a story. For what reason is it so unfamiliar appearing to be in sport?

Perhaps on the grounds that it is. Perhaps on the grounds that sports are a particularly male-ribbed space, and Venus is more customary - - not really ladylike, simply ordinary. In rehearses, I'm certain Venus gobbles Serena up. Prior in the U.S. Open, Serena was looking at rehearsing against Venus and said in extremely low tones, "Venus can do anything she desires to do."

I could envision the 6-foot Venus running down each shot Serena attempted. Not to cause her to feel awful - - but rather to improve her game. What's more, indeed, to prepare herself, yet it strikes me that Venus has as of now been satisfied by her tennis. In the vernacular of the times, Venus, as a competitor, as of now "did how she needed to treat." that is left for her is redundancy. Venus strikes me as being exhausted by reps of that sort, particularly when there is family - - and when there are new universes to consider.

Venus Williams is possible the most marvelous female tennis player ever to swing a racket, despite the fact that she will likely never have the sort of measurable approval that we generally partner with such athletic predominance. Assuming you figure Martina Navratilova on her greatest day could beat Venus Williams on her greatest day, all things considered, it's generally hypothesis, at any rate, right? In any case, perhaps there's one more sort of approval. Perhaps that is important for Venus' Secret, and why when she grins, she takes after a clandestine Mona Lisa rather than someone attempting to get on the front of "Amusement Weekly." Maybe there is an approval in aiding your younger sibling grow up and develop. Obviously, as men, we wouldn't know even a little bit concerning that, would we? What human would we be able to make, in any case? Ladies have that extreme power, and that extreme obligation. Would it be advisable for them to become familiar with our way, to contend, or would it be a good idea for us to get familiar with theirs, to succeed?

The present moment, is there any inquiry where the development lies between the Williams sisters? Venus is all around named. She is so lofty out there. Also cutthroat, as well. Serious in various ways.
Serena isn't really shaky - - you can perceive these young ladies came from affection - - yet she is a protected young lady who should be guaranteed of her womanhood. She needs to rival ladies, and on all levels, with Venus on the court, with different ladies on the court, yet additionally for consideration, and indeed, clearly for the consideration of men. They used to refer to it as "kid insane," I think, and really it's the method for a sort of self-approval of being alluring to men. Well, take a gander at the young lady. She's appealing, incredible grin, extraordinary, extraordinary body. With a body as, you needn't bother with a feline suit. A feline suit is needless excess. Also the blondie weave braid (not such a lot of the blondie weave braids, which are really beginning to work, in a Tina Turner sort of way). Specific the blondie weave rope ponytail that can be related with, say, Anna Kournikova.

Serena needs to be seen for something beyond her tennis. There's nothing especially amiss with that energetic kind of feeling. It's life. There are numerous approaches to contending, which, all things considered, is one more approach to competing for focus, one more method for getting everyone's eyes on you. Venus only continues on ahead, unobtrusively, with practically no requirement for a kind of va-boom approval. Venus deals with her private issue on the QT. I'm not going to discuss of school about her, yet she appears to be content, pretty blissful, and she doesn't show-off her connections, of any sort.

In any case, Venus won't ever sell her sister out, or short, or belittle her on decisions. Inquired as to whether she could at any point wear a "feline suit" (an inquiry planned to sabotage Serena's decisions), Venus would not chomp, saying, she likely would, however "she truly does nothing second."

The main thing she does is consistently pay special attention to Serena.

Serena won the U.S. Open first, the principal significant won by the sisters, in 1999. From that point forward, she's won Wimbledon this year, over Venus.

Venus had won Wimbledon the earlier two years, and the U.S. Open the earlier two years. She had set up her predominance to her own fulfillment, and surprisingly then couldn't completely appreciate it, specifically last year's U.S. Open, since she was stressed over how Serena would take losing to her in the finals, once more, similarly as she had been doing for their entire lives, essentially. Venus appeared to be significantly more intelligent and minding of her sister's sentiments than especially celebratory.

Could it be said that she is to a lesser extent a boss for that? Or on the other hand more? That is her mysterious.

Is it conceivable that certain individuals, especially among ladies competitors past and future, similar to Venus, contend on an altogether unique level, which is to, say more extensive, more profound, in all the more a group (family) idea?

They not just win, they ensure their entire family wins. Is that less honorable, or is it more outstanding to continually kick your child sister's butt, since you can, before crowds of thousands, on public TV, then, at that point, talk smack to her with regards to it, focus on it? We say Little Leaguers shouldn't celebrate, to us "appear" other Little Leaguers they don't have any idea, however at that point we grumble that Venus Williams has no "eye of the tiger" for her own blood. Don't have the foggiest idea who says we can't have it the two different ways; we do it constantly.
Ladies, for example, Venus probably won't stick to our implicit, rigid code of winning, yet they are similarly as leaned to decide a result, just in an alternate way. Not to say they are not as inhumane. Ladies are bounty inhumane when they need to be, simply relentless in an alternate way.

Chris Rock recounts the account of how all kinds of people lie, yet men lie little, frivolous, less higher perspective, and all the more frequently, constantly, truly. Chris Rock said a man may say, "Uh, I'm heading toward Tommy's home," not realizing the lady definitely knows he's lying since he does it constantly. However, a lady may say, "It's your child." And you actually never know. Not until it's past the point of no return.

Could be that Venus Williams is an undeniable executioner. Yet, not of her child sister. Simply in her own particular manner. John McEnroe prattles on with regards to how he could thump the Williams sisters (Mac is silly here - - you're surrounding 50, Mac, and Venus would destroy you; it wouldn't be an issue of you winning - - it would be an issue of you having a coronary episode or a stroke - - and I mean in any contest with Venus), or how the best 100 or 200 men could beat Venus, whatever, not realizing that he is approving her by making the solid examination.

Would a NBA player say he could beat a WNBA player? On the off chance that he did, that is the start of another sort of rivalry, yes? He is recognizing that she is a contender with him. In mark of reality, Venus can serve at around 120 mph, and with her lengthened, flexible body and extraordinary racket and volleying abilities, she can extend and get back would-be-champs easily. For what reason would 100 men be able to beat her? Since they are men? Since Johnny Mac, engaging or not, believes it's so?

The main way Johnny Mac could beat Venus Williams is if, for reasons unknown, she felt frustrated about him, and didn't have any desire to humiliate him, or didn't need the consideration, or any of twelve reasons that may be essential for Venus' Secret. In any case, I'll say this - - if, for some