Trump's Chief of Staff: A Tale of Power and Privilege




The role of the White House Chief of Staff is one of immense power and influence, as it serves as the gatekeeper to the President and oversees the day-to-day operations of the Oval Office. In the case of Donald Trump, his Chief of Staff played an outsized role in shaping his presidency, both for better and for worse.

Reince Priebus, the first Chief of Staff under Trump, was a seasoned political operative who had served as the Republican National Committee Chairman. Priebus was known for his organizational skills and his ability to get things done, but he also had a reputation for being a micromanager who was more interested in controlling the flow of information than in providing strategic advice.

Priebus's tenure as Chief of Staff was marked by chaos and infighting, as he struggled to manage Trump's impulsive behavior and his penchant for making rash decisions. Priebus was also unable to prevent several high-profile staff departures, including that of National Security Advisor Michael Flynn and Chief Strategist Steve Bannon.

In July 2017, Priebus was replaced by John Kelly, a retired Marine general who was known for his discipline and his ability to impose order on a chaotic situation. Kelly was able to bring some stability to the White House, but he too struggled to control Trump's behavior. Kelly eventually resigned in December 2018, citing differences with Trump over policy and management style.

The Trump presidency was a tumultuous one, and the role of the Chief of Staff was a particularly challenging one. Priebus and Kelly both faced the difficult task of trying to manage a President who was unpredictable and often unwilling to listen to advice. Despite their best efforts, they were unable to prevent the White House from becoming a chaotic and dysfunctional place.

Personal Anecdote

I remember watching the news coverage of the Trump presidency with a mixture of awe and dismay. I was awestruck by the sheer power that the President of the United States wields, but I was also dismayed by the way that Trump seemed to abuse that power. I was particularly struck by the role that the Chief of Staff played in trying to manage Trump's behavior. It seemed like an impossible task, and I couldn't help but feel sorry for the people who had to try to do it.

Call to Action

The role of the White House Chief of Staff is a critical one, and it is important that the President choose someone who is capable of handling the job. The next time you vote for President, take the time to learn about the candidates' qualifications for the job. Make sure that you are voting for someone who is qualified to lead the country and who has the temperament to handle the challenges of the job.